Comparison of upper limb burn injury versus simulated pathology in terms of gait and footprint parameters

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorÖzkal, Özden.
dc.contributor.authorErdem, Melek Merve.
dc.contributor.authorKismet, Kemal.
dc.contributor.authorTopuz, Semra.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T20:20:11Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T20:20:11Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesi, Hemşirelik Fakültesi, Hemşirelik Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Little is known about whether a simulated upper limb condition reflects a real (burn-injury) upper limb pathology in terms of gait/footprint parameters. Research question: The main aim of this study was to investigate the differences in these parameters between two conditions (real-simulation). Methods: The study included burn patients (n = 30) and a control group of 30 healthy subjects. Gait and footprint parameters were evaluated using the GAITRite electronic walkway. Kinesiophobia and pain were assessed with the Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale and Visual Analog Scale, respectively. Gait evaluation of the control group was performed randomly in two conditions:1. Normal arm swing (control group) 2. Elbow flexed at 90 degrees with a bandage (simulated group). Results: Step and stride length in the burn group were significantly shorter than in the other groups (p < 0.05). Stance phase was significantly higher while swing phase, velocity and cadence were lower in the burn group (p < 0.05). Peak time in the midfoot for both sides were significantly higher in the burn group (p < 0.05). Peak time in the hindfoot for the affected side was significantly lower while peak time in the hindfoot for the intact side was significantly higher in the burn group compared to the simulated group (p < 0.05). There were significant correlations between pain, kinesiophobia and velocity, and cadence in the burn group (p < 0.05). Significance: Compared to the other groups, patients with burn injury have different gait/footprint parameters due to increased pain and kinesiophobia. To determine the effects of upper limb injury and arm swing on gait parameters, a real pathology should be considered rather than a simulated pathology.en_US
dc.identifier.citationÖzkal, Ö., Erdem, M. M., Kısmet, K., Topuz, S. (2020). Comparison of Upper Limb Burn Injury Versus Simulated Pathology in Terms of Gait and Footprint Parameters. Gait & Posture, 75, 137-141.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.10.027en_US
dc.identifier.endpage141en_US
dc.identifier.issn0966-6362en_US
dc.identifier.issn1879-2219en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31683183en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage137en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.10.027
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/38525
dc.identifier.volume75en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000496927900021en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorKismet, Kemal.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER IRELAND LTDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofGAIT & POSTUREen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectArm swingen_US
dc.subjectBurn injuryen_US
dc.subjectGait analysisen_US
dc.subjectPlantar pressureen_US
dc.subjectSpatiotemporal characteristicsen_US
dc.titleComparison of upper limb burn injury versus simulated pathology in terms of gait and footprint parametersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Özden ÖZKAL.pdf
Boyut:
203.12 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Full Text Access
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Hemşirelik Bölümü/Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu