Can Degradation of Adhesive Interfaces Due to Water Storage Affect Stress Distributions? A Finite-Element Stress Analysis Study

dc.contributor.authorBelli, Sema
dc.contributor.authorEraslan, Oguz
dc.contributor.authorEskitascioglu, Gurcan
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T19:23:15Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T19:23:15Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentSelçuk Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this finite-element stress analysis (FEA) was to determine the effect of degradation due to water storage on stress distributions in root-filled premolar models restored with composite using either a self-etch (SE) or an etch-and-rinse (E&R) adhesive. Materials and Methods: Four premolar FEA models including root filling, MOD cavity, and composite restorations were created. The cavities were assumed to be treated by SE or E&R adhesives and stored in water for 18 months. The elastic properties of the adhesive-dentin interface after 24-h and 18-month water storage were obtained from the literature and applied to the FEA models. A 300-N load was applied on the functional cusps of the models. The SolidWorks/Cosmosworks structural analysis program was used and the results were presented considering the von Mises stresses. Results: Stresses in the cervical region increased over time on the load-application side of the main tooth models (SE: 84.11 MPa to 87.51 MPa; E&R: 100.24 MPa to 120.8 MPa). When the adhesive interfaces (hybrid layer, adhesive layer) and dentin were evaluated separately, the stresses near the root canal orifices increased over time in both models; however, this change was more noticeable in the E&R models. Stresses at the cavity corners decreased in the E&R model (within the adhesive layer), while SE models showed the opposite (within the hybrid layer). Conclusion: Change in the elastic modulus of the adhesive layer, hybrid layer, and dentin due to water storage has an effect on stresses in root-filled premolar models. The location and the level of the stresses differed depending on the adhesive used.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3290/j.jad.a37142en_US
dc.identifier.endpage527en_US
dc.identifier.issn1461-5185en_US
dc.identifier.issn1757-9988en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27834413en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage521en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a37142
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12395/33327
dc.identifier.volume18en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000392785200007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.selcuk20240510_oaigen_US
dc.subjectfinite element analysisen_US
dc.subjectdentinen_US
dc.subjectelastic modulusen_US
dc.subjectself-etch adhesiveen_US
dc.subjectetch-and-rinse adhesiveen_US
dc.subjectdegradationen_US
dc.titleCan Degradation of Adhesive Interfaces Due to Water Storage Affect Stress Distributions? A Finite-Element Stress Analysis Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar